| Commentary and Philosophy Non-Fiction posted May 13, 2021 |
  |
Political Correctness reaches the peak of absurdity
Pregnant Person? Say What!
by Elizabeth Emerald
Rant @ two cents
Old news in UK (2017) but news to me, now that the US has followed suit as regards the wording in CDC (Centers for Disease Control) recommendations for vaccination.
Official guidelines issued by the British Medical Association say mothers-to-be-should be referred to as 'pregnant people.'
This brilliant declaration was inspired by their learning of a case of ONE (at that time) pregnant female who'd been planning surgical transition to male after the birth.
Here's a thought: Refer to pregnant men-in-process as pregnant people. Let the other 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 per cent of the pregnant population continue to be called pregnant women.
I'm all for transgender rights, but this is ridiculous.
I am sorely tempted to classify this piece as satire.
Rant @ two cents
Old news in UK (2017) but news to me, now that the US has followed suit as regards the wording in CDC (Centers for Disease Control) recommendations for vaccination.
Official guidelines issued by the British Medical Association say mothers-to-be-should be referred to as 'pregnant people.'
This brilliant declaration was inspired by their learning of a case of ONE (at that time) pregnant female who'd been planning surgical transition to male after the birth.
Here's a thought: Refer to pregnant men-in-process as pregnant people. Let the other 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 per cent of the pregnant population continue to be called pregnant women.
I'm all for transgender rights, but this is ridiculous.
I am sorely tempted to classify this piece as satire.
Old news in UK (2017) but news to me, now that the US has followed suit as regards the wording in CDC (Centers for Disease Control) recommendations for vaccination.
Official guidelines issued by the British Medical Association say mothers-to-be-should be referred to as 'pregnant people.'
This brilliant declaration was inspired by their learning of a case of ONE (at that time) pregnant female who'd been planning surgical transition to male after the birth.
Here's a thought: Refer to pregnant men-in-process as pregnant people. Let the other 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 per cent of the pregnant population continue to be called pregnant women.
I'm all for transgender rights, but this is ridiculous.
I am sorely tempted to classify this piece as satire.
 Recognized |
Helza Blaze by MoonWillow on FanArtReview.com THANK YOU!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/29/dont-call-pregnant-women-expectant-mothers-might-offend-transgender/
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/pregnant-people.html
Pays
one point
and 2 member cents. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/29/dont-call-pregnant-women-expectant-mothers-might-offend-transgender/
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/pregnant-people.html
Artwork by MoonWillow at FanArtReview.com
You need to login or register to write reviews. It's quick! We only ask four questions to new members.
© Copyright 2024. Elizabeth Emerald All rights reserved.
Elizabeth Emerald has granted FanStory.com, its affiliates and its syndicates non-exclusive rights to display this work.