Pappa's Memories and Ramblings
Viewing comments for Chapter 72 "Reached Out Supremely?"Poems, Rants, Short Stories and Ramblings
3 total reviews
Comment from Phoenix Rising
It's tragic that the President and his Senate have put our Constitution under fire. My hope is that the 2020 election will heal the wounds that have divided us, and we have a new President that can bring us together.
My pleasure to read and review you poem.
Phoenix Rising
reply by the author on 19-Dec-2019
  |
It's tragic that the President and his Senate have put our Constitution under fire. My hope is that the 2020 election will heal the wounds that have divided us, and we have a new President that can bring us together.
My pleasure to read and review you poem.
Phoenix Rising
Comment Written 19-Dec-2019
reply by the author on 19-Dec-2019
-
Thank you for the Review and Kind compliments. Very interesting times we live in. Blessings to you.
Merry Christmas,
Comment from Darlene Franklin
This essence poem certainly carries the essence of why Democrats believe President Trump should be impeached. Not because he's a Republican, but because of what he's done. My only comment: Is there an intentional difference between voice less and voiceless, or is that a typo?
reply by the author on 12-Dec-2019
|
This essence poem certainly carries the essence of why Democrats believe President Trump should be impeached. Not because he's a Republican, but because of what he's done. My only comment: Is there an intentional difference between voice less and voiceless, or is that a typo?
Comment Written 12-Dec-2019
reply by the author on 12-Dec-2019
-
Thank you for the review and comments, the intent of the separation between voice less and voiceless in my offering was to emphasize the lack of not allowing the witnesses to testify. Not that there is a physical inability to speak. Thank you for the question, I hope this answer your great inquiry.Blessings to you,
-
ah. That makes sense. Thanks for exlaining.
-
good point. Thanks for explaining.
Comment from Alex Rosel
Political satire has a long history, documented evidence of satirical drawings dating back to 1500 BC in Ancient Egypt. So you are following a long and well-trod path {smiles}.
I particularly like your internal rhyme voice/choice {thumbs up}.
I am a little confused by your first line. Do you mean "voiceless" as a single word? If not, I'm struggling to understand. Maybe I'm missing something obvious. Or maybe you've formatted like this to achieve the internal rhyme?
Best of luck with the competition judging {smiles}.
reply by the author on 12-Dec-2019
|
Political satire has a long history, documented evidence of satirical drawings dating back to 1500 BC in Ancient Egypt. So you are following a long and well-trod path {smiles}.
I particularly like your internal rhyme voice/choice {thumbs up}.
I am a little confused by your first line. Do you mean "voiceless" as a single word? If not, I'm struggling to understand. Maybe I'm missing something obvious. Or maybe you've formatted like this to achieve the internal rhyme?
Best of luck with the competition judging {smiles}.
Comment Written 12-Dec-2019
reply by the author on 12-Dec-2019
-
Thank you for the review and comments, the intent of the separation between voice less and voiceless in my offering was to emphasize the lack of not allowing the witnesses to testify. Not that there is a physical inability to speak. Thank you for the question, I hope this answer your great inquiry.Blessings to you,
-
I understand now. As usual, I was being slow on the uptake.