Reviews from

Steve's Story-Poems

Viewing comments for Chapter 7 "Who's Smiling Now?"
A collection of my poems

21 total reviews 
Comment from writerwish
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

This is great. Yes I did your first story which was also very good. I think I like this one even better. I suppose I like the way you brought out the wife's character. Holds interest for sure.

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thanks
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
Comment from barkingdog
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

Well, this is the 'real' ending is it now?
In the first ending she is the enabler. In this she is strong and tells him off. I like her better, but would the readers who want to cry? and forgive and listen to ghosts as well? LOL
The reality of dog crap, kids driving her crazy and Fred fulfilling husbandly functions with 'more' than just his brain- all great.
Thank 'ghost'! You weren't lost after all. What a fantastic come back!

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thanks, bd
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
reply by barkingdog on 29-May-2011
    So, which one WAS the original that you are sticking to? The tear -jerker?
Comment from JoAnna77
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

Well - I was one of those that liked the earlier version - which I found quite inspirational. But I have to say that I don't hate this version - it is humorous rather than inspirational - and humor is good too. But it you were to ask me to choose which one I prefer - it would definately be the earlier version.

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thanks, JoAnna
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
Comment from jehanned
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

Oh no! You are right, I like the other better. However, this one is just as well written, with focused words and a driving plot. The rhyme moves well and the rhythm is fast. Tone is solid, and no one can be confused about the meaning behind it!

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thank you.
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
reply by jehanned on 29-May-2011
    I'm sure it is all based in reader sentiment. If I believed there was hope, I would take my husband back. But he and I have been through much, and we have learned to catch each other's backs and work through mistakes and issues. I think you did well to do BOTH! And they worked equally, like there was a not a differing ending!
Comment from KiwiGal
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

Ohhhh, my sides hurt!!!!! Abso-BRILL. I think you need to publish two versions - one ANZAC one and one for the rest of the world. The Americans love sanitized endings on the whole; the French would say: "Wot eez zee probLEM? Jus' fine anozzere lovere wezout ze 'azzle an' si yor keeds at ze wikenn.. an' jus poot ze dog out ze door; ee weel fine a laydee fren' for heemself zomware...'

You say your wife laughed; maybe you should take that as your own warning, heheheh.

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thanks, Heidi
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
reply by KiwiGal on 29-May-2011
    Serious? How can it be serious when he's been talking to a ghost??
    Nah, really, I know what you mean; I feel, it being an Aussie ballad, that this version would be more the truth, but there are lots of people out there who can't handle the truth.... hehehehehehehe.
    It doesn't matter which one you go with - we've got two endings for the price of one; I'm happy with that.
Comment from the blue pixel
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

I like them both Steve but I think I like the "Australiana" feel and language in this one not so much better, but I just like how it reads and as you say, it is more plausable. I guess this wiped the smile right off Smiler Jack's ghostly face. xx Pix

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thanks, Pix
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
reply by the blue pixel on 29-May-2011
    I understand your inclinatin to humour, of course. We are similar in this regard and I even get comments that someone was actually waiting for a humourous twist at the end of a poem I have kept serious and to be honest, it quite annoys me. I can't be funny all the time. I go with my gut. I gave up changing things because of what people said unless I have made a mistake in form, typo or legitimately like their suggestion better than what
reply by the blue pixel on 29-May-2011
    ..........(sorry, sent in error)...Just go with your gut Steve. We'd all be changing back and forth all the time if we tried to satisfy everyone else. For "I'm Watching" - one minute I get a six and a comment that the Rondeau was lacklustre, followed by a six from Judian James, whom I admire a great deal. I can tell you are proud of all you write as you should be an this piece is causing you some indecision. Your instinct should decide you, at least, that is my best advice to you. Good luck. xx Pix
Comment from moyramouse
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

I must be in a minority of one, but I like this darker ending:) I can see the wife giving him what for on the end of the telephone. Love the dog filling the yard with crap and good old Fred, filling in for his best mate:):):) Version 2 has my vote. xxxmouse

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thanks, mouse
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
reply by moyramouse on 29-May-2011
    I think the tear jerker will win every time on this site. I just love your zany humour and to me it is more believable that the wife would not take him back. Call me a cynic:):):)
Comment from Laurie Flori
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

Love it - you did continue it - you can even do it again and have the wife get the surprise of her life when Smiler Jack shows up in court & her husband wins everything & she gets nothing. Such a funny story - your rhyming is fantastic.

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thank you
    It is interesting; comments are running about 50-50 on which ending is better. This one satisfies my instinct to add humour to every situation, while the other one is more of a tear-jerker. I have to stick with the original one since the overall tone of the poem is more serious...
reply by Laurie Flori on 29-May-2011
    Sadly to say, I am removing myself from this site. I received a warning from FS about my poem â??Mean & Hateful Reviewsâ?? The reason that I wrote that was about a person on this site named KiwiGal who reviewed my poem Panic Attack Prayer. She tried to get me to buy some of her Holistic remedy stuff for a total body cleanse â?? meaning drink it & you know the rest. I didnâ??t want any part of it so I tried just not replying. Then she messaged me very rude saying â??Iâ??ll take that as a no, & she said that I was a burden to my family for them having to put up with me having them & that I was happy making myself the center of attention & that I didnâ??t want to be cured from them.â?? So I couldnâ??t just call her every name I could think of or reply hatefully per FS rules, so I thought the tactful way to do it was to write a poem about respect in reviewing. They removed it & issued me a warning â?? they didnâ??t do anything to KiwiGal. I cannot be part of a site that allows this to go on. So sadly, I am saying goodbye to all of you. But I am saying good riddance to FS. If you would like to connect with me you can find me on Facebook under Laurie A. Flori or Sears Homes in Carlinville, IL â?? Standard Addition. I will miss you guys, Laurie
Comment from Inge_Meldgaard
Good
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

Yes, good, but it's assuming he told his wife about Smiler Jack, which doesn't seem to have been the case! It's equally well written, but this seems to me to be a serious flaw ;P

This rating does not count towards story rating or author rank.
The highest and the lowest rating are not included in calculations.

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Just a bit of fun really.
    I assumed that readers would think there had been an earlier part of the phone call - maybe I should have made it explicit...
reply by Inge_Meldgaard on 29-May-2011
    Yes, the story is so explicit, with a strong timeline, that the assumption the wife would be told about Smiler Jack is not really suitable, particularly in terms of how the verses are written. Personally, I doubt if the man would tell the wife!
Comment from DIS-illusioned
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

--Well, I read the first part and version, and liked it. So, let's see how this end rendition goes.
--"but his story inspires our hero"
I know what you mean, but I wouldn't exactly call the narrator here 'a hero'. More like a prodigal family man.
--"But what if she said no..... "
But I thought she'd agreed to give him a chance already, from the first part ... Oh, yes! 'Another' ending --what 'if' she had said no ...
--"I explained howthe bloody plot"
Reads awkward. Revise.
--"Your best mate, Fred's been callin' round; he's helped me to stay sane.
He's twice the man you ever were, and I don't mean just his brain!"
Fuckin' Fred! I'd shoot his traitoring ass! :)
--"This call has been recorded; it's evidence of course.
A bloke that chats with ghosts ain't got much chance in a divorce."
Oh! Cold bitch!
--Well then, the narrator's original plan proceeds, I guess. The dark voices intensify and it's off to meet his maker --if He'll even see him.
Nice alternate end, Kiwi, though definitely not desirable.

 Comment Written 29-May-2011


reply by the author on 29-May-2011
    Thanks - major typo in there - don't know how I missed that.
    Yes I guess if he was depressed before he's certainly not going to be cheered up by this - just my perverse brain at work.
reply by DIS-illusioned on 29-May-2011
    Remember, it is from 'God's perverse' mind that the universe came about --at least, I think so. lol! Hope you're not a fanatic Christian fundamental. :)